Oposa vs factoran pdf

The plaintiffs demanded that all existing timber concessions be cancelled, and that no new ones be issued. The constitutional right to a healthy environment, by. The novel principles laid down in the oposa vs factoran case, are largely to influence profoundly the direction and course of the protection and management of the environment in the philippines. Muyco, director of mines and geosciences bureau, respondents g. At its core, environmental justice is about legal transformations aimed at curbing abuses of power that result in the poor and. I happened to be the who wrote the decision for the court en banc. The significance of the minors oposa case vina 1994.

The case is a contributor to the development of international environmental law. Peni, a domestic, nonstock and nonprofit corporation organized for the purpose of, inter alia, engaging in concerted action geared for the protection of our environment and natural resources. The crin code it sets out our values, our principles and our vision for a rightsrespecting world and how we intend to get there, in the hope that others will collaborate or simply take inspiration and start their own rebellion. Legal issues affecting sustainability of integrated. Factoran is cited as a significant example of the justiciability of the right to health. The petition stems from a civil case instituted by minors duly represented and joined by their respective parents against fulgencio s. The petitioners, all minors, sought the help of the supreme court to order the respondent, then secretary of denr, to cancel all existing timber license agreement tla in the country and to cease and desist from receiving, accepting, processing, renewing or approving new tlas. Oposa vs factoran 224 scra 792 case digest by shelan teh free download as word doc. Peni, a domestic, nonstock and nonprofit corporation organized for the purpose of, inter alia, engaging in. Petitioners personality to sue in behalf of the succeeding generations is based on the concept of intergenerational responsibility insofar as the right to a balanced and. Republic of the philippines supreme court manila en banc g. Miners association of the philippines vs factoran pdf. Intergeneration responsibility has been enunciated in two landmark cases, namely.

Manarpiis vs texan philippines case digest labor relations casefull description miners association of the philippines, inc. Factoran, where the philippine supreme court held that a group of minors had the right to sue on behalf of succeeding generations because every generation has a responsibility to the next to preserve nature. Factoran a landmark case in judicial thinking for environmental governance. A taxpayers class suit was filed by minors juan antonio oposa, et al. Antonio oposa, suite 6j westgate tower, investment drive, madrigal business park 1780 ayala alabang, muntinlupa city, philippines. Factoran as basis for asserting that the right to breathe is part of the right to life as an acknowledged human right. Factoran s concept of intergenerational responsibility was cited in a case in bangladesh. Celestina naguiat filed an application for registration of title to four parcels of land located in panan, botolan, zambales. Factoran is a landmark decision of the supreme court of the philippines which. The right to a sound environment in the philippines. Oposa vs factoran summary complaint natural and legal rights. This petition bears upon the right of filipinos to a balanced and healthful ecology which the petitioners dramatically associate with the twin concepts of intergenerational responsibility and intergenerational justice. Petitioners personality to sue in behalf of the succeeding generations is based on the concept of intergenerational responsibility insofar as the right to a balanced and healthful environment is.

Adalah dosen hukum lingkungan pada fakultas hukum universitas indonesia sejak 1999. Factoran case is not, strictly speaking, the first environmental case in the philip pines. Oposa is honored for his many distinguished contributions to the. Introduction over the years, the philippine supreme court has built a reputation as a proponent of judicial environmental activism. A lower court dismissed oposas suit, saying the plaintiff children did not have legal personality. Class action seeking the cancellation and nonissuance of timber licence agreements which allegedly infringed the constitutional right to a balanced and. Factoran is a landmark decision of the supreme court of the philippines which recognizes the doctrine of intergenerational responsibility on the environment in the philippine legal system. So oposa sued fulgencio factoran, the secretary of environment and natural resources, acting on behalf of 43 children including his own, and on behalf of children not yet born. The novel principles laid down in the oposa vs factoran case.

Oposa made headlines worldwide for his role in the landmark case oposa v. A taxpayers class suit was initiated by the philippine ecological network incorporated peni together with the minors oposa and their parents. Oposa is honored for his many distinguished contributions to the development and implementation. But the supreme court reversed the decision in favor of oposa, thus setting the landmark oposa vs factoran that has been used as a legal precedent in courts as far away as bangladesh. Secretary of the department of environment and natural resources, and. Some landmark jurisprudence include the cases of oposa et al. Republic of the philippines supreme court manila en banc. Factoran, where the philippine supreme court held that a group of minors had the. Impleaded as an additional plaintiff is the philippine ecological network, inc. Cause of action, right to a balanced and healthful ecology, right to health, nonimpairment clause. The plaintiffs in this case are all minors duly represented and joined by their parents. Factoran, as the case is known, was oposas very first legal action and he lost, largely on the grounds that people. Factoranalandmark case in judicial thinking forenvironmental governance.

The petitioners right to a balanced and healthful ecology is as clear as denrs duty to protect and advance the said right. The petitioner had transported six carabaos in a pump boat from masbate to iloilo in january 1984, when they were confiscated by the police station commander for violation of e. Erdb environmental jurisprudence of the supreme court of. Pages in category supreme court of the philippines cases the following 16 pages are in this category, out of 16 total. The petitioners are all minors duly represented and joined by their respective parents. Oposa vs factoran lawsuit complaint prueba gratuita. But the supreme court reversed the decision in favor of oposa, thus setting the landmark oposa vs factoran that has been used as a. Apr 24, 2012 principal petitioners, are all minors duly represented and joined by their respective parents.

The center for international environmental law ciel is pleased to award the annual ciel international environmental law award to antonio a. Rosario, presiding judge of the rtc, makati, branch 66. Oposa vs factoran summary complaint natural and legal. Factoran, the then secretary of the department of environment and natural resources denr. In the book the law of energy for sustainable development by the iucn academy of environmental law research studies, a study cites oposa vs. The court seemed to understand the imperative of tempering economic growth with protecting the environment. The principal petitioners, all minors duly represented and joined by their respective parents. Juan antonio, anna rosario and jose alfonso, all surnamed oposa, minors, and represented by their parents antonio and rizalina oposa, et al. The complaint was instituted as a taxpayers class suit and alleges that plaintiffs are all citizens of rp, taxpayers, and entitled to the full benefit, use and enjoyment of the natural resource treasure that is the countrys virgin tropical rainforests. Environmental law, constitutional law, intergenerational responsibility. The first major case the court decided with regard to this clause was the minors oposa case, in which the plaintiffs filed a class action law suit on behalf of their children and future generations, asking the court to order the government to cancel all existing timber license agreements in the philippines and to stop issuing new licenses.

The philippine supreme court carved a permanent niche for itself in environmental law lore when it promulgated oposa v. The national traffic commission recommended the director of public works and to the secretary of public works and communication that animaldrawn vehicles be prohibited from passing along rosario st. This oposa vs factoran pdf teachers guide and the japanese papermaking workshop experience was made. The united nations environmental programme unep considers oposa vs. The applicant alleges that she is the owner of the said parcels of land having acquired them by purchase from its previous owners and their predecessorsininterest who have been in possession thereof for more than thirty 30 years.

508 770 290 454 1104 574 363 757 487 454 596 1263 664 896 1212 1195 1545 337 604 608 1188 949 404 602 485 176 866 122 93 229 323 1014